Show Summary Details
Page of

(p. 159) 12. Interpretation 

(p. 159) 12. Interpretation
(p. 159) 12. Interpretation

Paul S. Davies

Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD LAW TROVE ( © Oxford University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in Oxford Law Trove for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy and Legal Notice).

date: 18 June 2021

This chapter examines approaches to contract interpretation. Interpretation is the exercise by which the meaning of the contract is ascertained. Under the so-called traditional approach to interpretation, where the contractual language chosen was clear and unambiguous, that language was simply given effect. By contrast, under the ‘modern’ approach to interpretation, a much broader range of factors can be taken into account, and courts now appear able to depart from the ‘plain meaning’ of a written document. The modern approach takes into account the ‘matrix of fact’ in which the contract is concluded, including the purpose of the contract. The modern approach has been praised for allowing judges greater flexibility in order to reach a fair result, but criticised for undermining commercial certainty, potentially prejudicing third parties, and intruding into the domain traditionally occupied by the doctrine of rectification.

Access to the complete content on Law Trove requires a subscription or purchase. Public users are able to search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter without a subscription.

Please subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you have purchased a print title that contains an access code, please see the information provided with the code or instructions printed within the title for information about how to register your code.

For questions on access or troubleshooting, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.