Show Summary Details
Page of

3. Mens Rea: Intention, Recklessness, Negligence and Gross Negligence 

3. Mens Rea: Intention, Recklessness, Negligence and Gross Negligence
3. Mens Rea: Intention, Recklessness, Negligence and Gross Negligence

Janet Loveless

Page of

PRINTED FROM OXFORD LAW TROVE ( © Oxford University Press, 2018. All Rights Reserved. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a PDF of a single chapter of a title in Oxford Law Trove for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy and Legal Notice).

date: 25 February 2020

This chapter focuses on Mens Rea (MR), the mental element of a criminal offence, and discusses some of the components of MR, which include intention, recklessness, negligence, and gross negligence. It explains that intention can either be direct or oblique and that recklessness may be defined as the conscious taking of an unjustified risk. Negligence is unreasonable conduct that creates risk while gross negligence is a high degree of negligence deserving criminal punishment. The chapter also considers several examples of cases relevant to MR and analyses the court decisions in each of them.

Access to the complete content on Law Trove requires a subscription or purchase. Public users are able to search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and chapter without a subscription.

Please subscribe or login to access full text content.

If you have purchased a print title that contains an access code, please see the information provided with the code or instructions printed within the title for information about how to register your code.

For questions on access or troubleshooting, please check our FAQs, and if you can't find the answer there, please contact us.