African cases (Ethiopia/Liberia v South Africa) (1966) ); (b) that local remedies have not been exhausted (eg Interhandel case ( Switzerland v USA ) (1959) ); (c) that the case is, or
1-9 of 9 Results for:
- All: Essential Cases x
- Study & Revision x
- Public International x
Did you mean: Essential Cases: Land Law, Essential Cases: Contract Law, Essential Cases: Tort Law ... Essential Cases: Land Law, Essential Cases: Contract Law, Essential Cases: Tort Law, Essential Cases: Equity & Trusts, Essential Cases: EU Law, Essential Cases: Criminal Law, Essential Cases: Public Law, Essential Cases: Contract Law 5e more less
Chapter
10. Peaceful settlement of disputes
Chapter
11. Use of force
gravity, which is essential for an attack to be classified as an armed attack. This gravity test seems to have been slightly watered down in the Oil Platforms case.
Chapter
3. The law of treaties
Oil Platforms case : Case Concerning Oil Platforms (Islamic Republic of Iran v United States of America) , Merits, Judgment, ICJ Rep (2003), p 803 In this case, the Court had
Chapter
9. State responsibility
Necessity (Art 25) : necessity denotes those exceptional cases where the only way a State can safeguard an essential interest threatened by a grave and imminent peril, for example
Chapter
5. Personality, statehood, and recognition
Key cases The facts of the most significant key cases have already been explained in various sections of this chapter. CASE FACTS PRINCIPLES
Chapter
8. The law of the sea
three-stage approach ritually. Key cases CASE FACTS PRINCIPLES North Sea Continental Shelf Case (Germany v Denmark/The Netherlands) , ICJ Rep
Chapter
1. The nature of international law and the international legal system
landmark dictum of the ICJ in the Barcelona Traction case in 1970 (see ‘Key cases’), in which the Court drew ‘an essential distinction’ between obligations owed to particular States
Chapter
4. The relationship between international and domestic law
private rights. See also the International Tin Council cases (see ‘Key cases’). Medellín v Texas , 552 US 491 (2008) The case concerned the application of the Vienna Convention
Chapter
13. International criminal law
those persons to whom essential tasks have been assigned and who can at any time frustrate the offence. What this means is that co-perpetratorship requires an essential—as opposed to merely
