resort’. 156 In Re A (Residence Order) Coleridge J called it an ‘essential weapon or tool …. It may indeed be a case of putting a gun to a parent’s head to force him or her to rethink’
1-20 of 74 Results for:
- All: Essential Cases x
- Family x
Did you mean: Essential Cases: Criminal Law, Essential Cases: Contract Law, Essential Cases: Equity & Trusts ... Essential Cases: Criminal Law, Essential Cases: Contract Law, Essential Cases: Equity & Trusts, Essential Cases: EU Law, Essential Cases: Land Law, Essential Cases: Public Law, Essential Cases: Tort Law more less
Chapter
10. Private Law Decisions about Children
Chapter
12. Child Protection: Care, Supervision, and Adoption
threshold is met in Ella’s case. In the home, she appears to be suffering from emotional and physical neglect at a time when good quality care is essential to her development. But the
Chapter
5. Cohabitants and Remedies Not Dependent on Marriage
situations outlined in the scenarios in this chapter, detriment is an essential element. There are a small number of cases in which it is not unconscionable to deny a remedy even when
Chapter
9. Children’s Rights and Welfare
Alfie Evans case came soon after the case of Charlie Gard, another highly controversial case that attracted much attention internationally as well as in the UK. Key Case Great Ormond
Chapter
4. Financial Provision on Divorce
cent of cases in her study of court records, and that in most cases where a pension order was made the parties were in their early 50s, in contrast to non-pension order cases where on
Chapter
11. Child Protection: State Support for Children
of order will achieve the essential end of promoting the welfare of the child. Separation is only to be contemplated if immediate separation is essential to secure the child’s safety:
Chapter
8. Parenthood and Parental Responsibility
at the leading cases, all of which involve the removal of PR from fathers as opposed to any other category of PR holder. We start with Key Case Re P. Key Case Re P (Terminating
Chapter
6. Financial Support for Children
the house or buying herself a car. 112 In looking at those cases in which the primary carer is on benefits, it is essential to understand the impact on means-tested benefits where receipt
Chapter
3. Ending a Marriage or Civil Partnership
tting cases discussed in this chapter, especially in relation to the behaviour ground, but the most important case, which includes a detailed discussion of the previous case law, is
Chapter
7. Domestic Abuse
Was this, in reality, simply a case of marriage breakdown in which the Appellant was not genuinely in fear of her husband; or was it a classic case of domestic abuse, in which one
Chapter
2. Marriage and Civil Partnership
reconcile the reasoning in some cases with the reasoning in others. 81 We can see this by comparing two cases. • Gereis v Yagoub 82 is a case in which the parties had ‘married’
Chapter
14. Family Law in Practice
George Patrick Nicholls
public family law cases is analogous to the distinction often applied to civil and criminal cases. That is, civil cases are analogous to private family law cases in that they relate
Chapter
10. Children needing services, care, and protection
go to a family centre on specified days. In such cases, cooperation from the persons looking after the child is normally essential if the supervision order is to work. Consequently
Chapter
11. Private Disputes over Children
each features of this case. Those features make the case sensitive, difficult and distressing, but none of them, individually or together, affect the essential approach of the court
Chapter
10. Private Law Decisions about Children
resort’. 163 In Re A (Residence Order) , Coleridge J called it an ‘essential weapon or tool. … It may indeed be a case of putting a gun to a parent’s head to force him or her to rethink’
Chapter
5. Property Division on the Breakdown of Non-Matrimonial Relationships
Warren Barr
ownership of the home. Tomlinson LJ said: It is essential, in my judgment, to bear in mind that, in deciding in such a case what shares are fair, the court is not concerned with
Chapter
8. Children’s rights
rejected as a general theory because of its inability to accommodate fully the case of children’s rights. In the case of children at least, the interest theory is more apposite. As Michael
Chapter
12. Child Protection: Care, Supervision, and Adoption
threshold is met in Ella’s case. In the home, she appears to be suffering from emotional and physical neglect at a time when good quality care is essential to her development. But the
Chapter
5. Cohabitants and Remedies Not Dependent on Marriage
finally resolved in the joint names case of Hudson v Hathaway , albeit probably obiter dicta. The Court of Appeal yet again held that detriment was essential. Lewison LJ found that in Stack
Chapter
4. Financial remedies on divorce and dissolution
exceptional cases. Indeed, those cases where the principle was successfully invoked were cases in which ‘justice cried out for a remedy’. 703 This, however, was not one of those cases. This