Book

Essential Cases: Criminal Law provides a bridge between course textbooks and key case judgments. Essential Cases provides you with succinct summaries of some of the landmark and most influential cases in criminal law. Each summary begins with a review of the main case facts and decision. The summary is then concluded with expert commentary on the case from the author, Jonathan Herring, including his assessment of the wider questions raised by the decision.

Book

Essential Cases: Criminal Law provides a bridge between course textbooks and key case judgments. Essential Cases provides you with succinct summaries of some of the landmark and most influential cases in criminal law. Each summary begins with a review of the main case facts and decision. The summary is then concluded with expert commentary on the case from the author, Jonathan Herring, including his assessment of the wider questions raised by the decision.

Book

Essential Cases: Criminal Law provides a bridge between course textbooks and key case judgments. Essential Cases provides you with succinct summaries of some of the landmark and most influential cases in criminal law. Each summary begins with a review of the main case facts and decision. The summary is then concluded with expert commentary on the case from the author, Jonathan Herring, including his assessment of the wider questions raised by the decision.

Chapter

necessity 357 7.2.3 7.2.3 Medical cases Medical cases 358 7.2.4 7.2.4 Non-medical cases: self-help and direct action Non-medical cases: self-help and direct action 364

Chapter

It is quite apparent from these cases that there is no definitive test of foresight of the essential facts/circumstances of P’s case. It might be thought that this is too low

Chapter

application of the presumption in this case. The purpose of the section is, of course, to protect children. An age ingredient was therefore an essential ingredient of the offence. This factor

Chapter

liability is that the accomplice must know the essential elements of the offence (including the principal’s mental element), but in these cases the accomplice usually knows that the would-be

Chapter

Another way of putting it is that mens rea being now an essential ingredient in manslaughter … this could not in the present case be established in relation to the first ground except

Chapter

[1986] AC 27, 38–39; but in that case Lord Bridge was dealing with a different situation from that which exists in the present case. There may be many cases in which undercover police officers

Chapter

forms an essential part of the context in which to make a just evaluation whether a qualifying trigger properly falls within the ambit of subsections 55(3) and (4)’. 114 The case for saying

Chapter

offence with MR. This also applies to defences. In most cases, the prosecution will have the burden of proving the essential elements of the offence (AR and MR) but also that the defendant

Chapter

sentencing for this offence, 21% of cases involved an absolute discharge in 2014, 40% of cases were met with a suspended sentence, and nearly 40% of cases were deemed to merit a sentence

Chapter

in such cases, but it does not manifest itself in the form of voluntary conduct. Automatism is often regarded as a defence to crime rather than as a denial of an essential component

Chapter

determination in murder cases. 47 Although arguments based on Art. 5 only have purchase at the stage where D is deprived of liberty, they are relevant in many cases and it would be best

Chapter

[1994] 1 WLR 689. In my view the ruling in that case was based on principled and cogent reasoning and it marked a sound and essential clarification of the law. I would hold that ‘bodily

Chapter

requirement that it [murder] should be a voluntary act is essential, not only in a murder case, but also in every criminal case. No act is punishable if it is done involuntarily: and an

Chapter

own lawyer—are in many cases themselves involved in directing cases towards guilty pleas, and hence towards uncontested administrative processing of such cases. 37 What has just been

Chapter

community. If the case is prosecuted in court, then the CPS will be responsible for conducting the prosecution. Its decisions throughout the course of the case, from referral by the

Chapter

on dishonesty following the Feely case. For many years, the standard direction on dishonesty was set out in the case of R v Ghosh. The case created guidelines for juries in situations

Chapter

might in some cases increase public alarm, and might in other cases facilitate the perpetration and concealment of the wrong. 67 Prosecutions were often brought in cases where the agreement