1-20 of 4,171 Results for:
- All: Essential Cases x
Did you mean: Essential Cases: Contract Law, Essential Cases: Equity & Trusts, Essential Cases: EU Law ... Essential Cases: Contract Law, Essential Cases: Equity & Trusts, Essential Cases: EU Law, Essential Cases: Land Law, Essential Cases: Public Law, Essential Cases: Tort Law, Essential Cases: Criminal Law, Essential Cases: Contract Law 5e more less
Book
Nicola Jackson
Book
Derek Whayman
Book
Noreen O'Meara
Book
Aruna Nair
Book
Thomas E. Webb
Book
Craig Purshouse
Book
Jonathan Herring
Book
Jonathan Herring
Book
Noreen O'Meara
Book
Thomas E. Webb
Book
Aruna Nair
Book
Craig Purshouse
Book
Derek Whayman
Book
Nicola Jackson
Chapter
Henderson v Dorset Healthcare University NHS Foundation [2020] UKSC 43
amenity that arose prior to the killing (at [146]). Comment Henderson is an essential case because it clarifies the approach to illegality. This area of law had been in a confused
Chapter
Henderson v Dorset Healthcare University NHS Foundation [2020] UKSC 43
amenity that arose prior to the killing (at [146]). Comment Henderson is an essential case because it clarifies the approach to illegality. This area of law had been in a confused
Chapter
Barclays Bank Plc v Various Claimants [2020] UKSC 13
the bank was not vicariously liable for his torts. Comment Barclays is an essential case as it clarifies the limits of the ‘akin to employment’ test and maintains the traditional
Chapter
Barclays Bank Plc v Various Claimants [2020] UKSC 13
the bank was not vicariously liable for his torts. Comment Barclays is an essential case as it clarifies the limits of the ‘akin to employment’ test and maintains the traditional
Chapter
Plaumann v Commission (Case 25/62), EU:C:1963:17, [1963] ECR 95, 15 July 1963
Commission (Case 11/82), EU:C:1985:18, [1985] ECR 207, 17 January 1985 Case 11/82 Piraiki-Patraiki [1985] ECR 207 , Joined cases 789/79 and 790/79 Calpak [1980] ECR 1949, and Case C-519/07
Chapter
Swindle v Harrison [1997] 4 All ER 705, Court of Appeal
1 (CA) and Target Holdings Ltd v Redferns [1996] 1 AC 421 (HL), both noted in Essential Cases , demonstrated there was a requirement of causation in compensation claims against