Essential Cases: EU Law provides a bridge between course textbooks and key case judgments. This case document summarizes the facts and decision in Carvalho and others v Parliament and Council (‘People’s Climate Case’) (Case C-565/19 P), EU:C:2021:252, 25 March 2021. The document also includes supporting commentary from author Noreen O'Meara.
Chapter
Carvalho and others v Parliament and Council (‘People's Climate Case’) (Case C-565/19 P), EU:C:2021:252, Judgment of 25 March 2021; Carvalho and others v Parliament and Council (Case T-330/18), EU:T:2019:324, Order of 8 May 2019.
Chapter
Plaumann v Commission (Case 25/62), EU:C:1963:17, [1963] ECR 95, 15 July 1963
Essential Cases: EU Law provides a bridge between course textbooks and key case judgments. This case document summarizes the facts and decision in Plaumann v Commission (Case 25/62), EU:C:1963:17, [1963] ECR 95, 15 July 1963. The document also includes supporting commentary from author Noreen O'Meara.
Chapter
Piraiki-Patraiki and others v Commission (Case 11/82), EU:C:1985:18, [1985] ECR 207, 17 January 1985
Essential Cases: EU Law provides a bridge between course textbooks and key case judgments. This case document summarizes the facts and decision in Piraiki-Patraiki and others v Commission (Case 11/82), EU:C:1985:18, [1985] ECR 207, 17 January 1985. The document also includes supporting commentary from author Noreen O'Meara.
Chapter
Unión de Pequeños Agricultores v Council of the European Union (Case C-50/00 P), EU:C:2002:462, [2002] ECR I-6677, 25 July 2002
Essential Cases: EU Law provides a bridge between course textbooks and key case judgments. This case document summarizes the facts and decision in Unión de Pequeños Agricultores v Council of the European Union (Case C-50/00 P), EU:C:2002:462, [2002] ECR I-6677, 25 July 2002. The document also includes supporting commentary from author Noreen O'Meara.
Chapter
Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami and others v European Parliament and Council of the European Union (Cases T-18/10 and C-583/11 P ‘Inuit I’), EU:T:2011:419, 6 September 2011/ EU:C:2013:625, 3 October 2013
Essential Cases: EU Law provides a bridge between course textbooks and key case judgments. This case document summarizes the facts and decision in Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami and others v European Parliament and Council of the European Union (Cases T-18/10 and C-583/11 P ‘Inuit I’), EU:T:2011:419, 6 September 2011/ EU:C:2013:625, 3 October 2013. The document also includes supporting commentary from author Noreen O'Meara.
Chapter
Unión de Pequeños Agricultores v Council of the European Union (Case C-50/00 P), EU:C:2002:462, [2002] ECR I-6677, 25 July 2002
Essential Cases: EU Law provides a bridge between course textbooks and key case judgments. This case document summarizes the facts and decision in Unión de Pequeños Agricultores v Council of the European Union (Case C-50/00 P), EU:C:2002:462, [2002] ECR I-6677, 25 July 2002. The document also includes supporting commentary from author Noreen O’Meara.
Chapter
Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami and others v European Parliament and Council of the European Union (Cases T-18/10 and C-583/11 P ‘Inuit I’), EU:T:2011:419, 6 September 2011/ EU:C:2013:625, 3 October 2013
Essential Cases: EU Law provides a bridge between course textbooks and key case judgments. This case document summarizes the facts and decision in Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami and others v European Parliament and Council of the European Union (Cases T-18/00 and C-583/11 P ‘Inuit I’), EU:T:2011:419, 6 September 2011/ EU:C:2013:625, 3 October 2013. The document also includes supporting commentary from author Noreen O’Meara.
Chapter
Plaumann v Commission (Case 25/62), EU:C:1963:17, [1963] ECR 95, 15 July 1963
Essential Cases: EU Law provides a bridge between course textbooks and key case judgments. This case document summarizes the facts and decision in Plaumann v Commission (Case 25/62), EU:C:1963:17, [1963] ECR 95, 15 July 1963. The document also includes supporting commentary from author Noreen O’Meara.
Chapter
Piraiki-Patraiki and others v Commission (Case 11/82), EU:C:1985:18, [1985] ECR 207, 17 January 1985
Essential Cases: EU Law provides a bridge between course textbooks and key case judgments. This case document summarizes the facts and decision in Piraiki-Patraiki and others v Commission (Case 11/82), EU:C:1985:18, [1985] ECR 207, 17 January 1985. The document also includes supporting commentary from author Noreen O’Meara.
Chapter
7. Challenging EU action or inaction
Titles in the Complete series combine extracts from a wide range of primary materials with clear explanatory text to provide readers with a complete introductory resource. This chapter discusses the role of the Court of Justice in ensuring that the rule of law in the EU is observed both by Member States and EU Institutions. The chapter examines infringement actions under Article 258 TFEU, and financial penalties for Member States under Article 260 TFEU. The discussion of judicial review considers acts that may be challenged; who can bring an action under Article 263 TFEU; permissible applicants under Article 263 TFEU; non-privileged applicants; reforming the criteria for locus standi for non-privileged applicants. The chapter also explains the grounds for annulment; the effect of annulment; the plea of illegality; failure to act; and the relationship between Article 263 TFEU and Article 265 TFEU.