The Concentrate Questions and Answers series offer the best preparation for tackling exam questions. Each book includes typical questions, bullet-pointed answer plans, suggested answers, and author commentary. This book offers advice on what to expect in exams and how best to prepare. This chapter covers questions on equitable estoppel.
Chapter
All books in this flagship series contain carefully selected substantial extracts from key cases, legislation, and academic debate, providing able students with a stand-alone resource. This chapter is concerned with proprietary estoppel. Proprietary estoppel is a means by which a party (B) can gain some protection against an owner of land (A), even if B has no contract with A and even if A has not formally given B a property right in relation to A’s land. Proprietary estoppel is therefore a means by which B can obtain an equitable interest in A’s land. It is noted that proprietary estoppel is very different from other forms of estoppel; so different that the term ‘estoppel’ is positively misleading. The chapter considers the requirements of a proprietary estoppel claim, including the role of unconscionability, how the courts determine the extent of any right arising through proprietary estoppel, and the impact of such rights on third parties.
Chapter
Course-focused and comprehensive, the Textbook on Land Law provides an accessible overview of one key area on the law curriculum. This chapter examines the doctrine of proprietary estoppel. It discusses the nature of proprietary estoppel; the expectations of future rights; the criteria for proprietary estoppel; essential elements; satisfying the equity; the nature of the equity arising from estoppel; and the relationship between proprietary estoppel and constructive trusts.
Chapter
Essential Cases: Equity & Trusts provides a bridge between course textbooks and key case judgments. This case document summarizes the facts and decision in Guest v Guest [2022] UKSC 27, Supreme Court. The document also includes supporting commentary from author Derek Whayman.
Chapter
Proprietary estoppel is a doctrine of considerable antiquity, which, while the subject of considerable judicial development in the nineteenth century, lurked in a degree of obscurity until interest in the subject was revived comparatively recently. Estoppel is seen as having two main forms; in land law, it has long been accepted that estoppel can operate directly to found a cause of action. When operating in this way, the doctrine is referred to as proprietary estoppel, which is the focus of this chapter. It first considers the origin of the doctrine before turning to equitable estoppel, estoppel and other concepts, and estoppel and third parties.
Chapter
Course-focused and comprehensive, the Textbook on Land Law provides an accessible overview of one key area on the law curriculum. This chapter examines the doctrine of proprietary estoppel. It discusses the nature of proprietary estoppel; the expectations of future rights; the criteria for proprietary estoppel; essential elements; satisfying the equity; the nature of the equity arising from estoppel; and the relationship between proprietary estoppel and constructive trusts.
Chapter
Course-focused and comprehensive, the Textbook on Land Law provides an accessible overview of one key area on the law curriculum. This chapter explains the contract for the sale of an estate or an interest in land. It discusses the rules for contracts made on or after September 1989; contracts made before 27 September 1989; and the use of estoppel and constructive trusts to replace part performance after the Law of Property (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1989. It also covers estoppel and constructive trusts; electronic contracts; effects of the contract; remedies for breach of contract; and application of the law to the sale of the freehold property, 2 Trant Way.
Chapter
The chapter explores the doctrine of proprietary estoppel—a means by which a person may acquire a proprietary interest in another’s land. If made out, a claim to proprietary estoppel allows for the informal creation and acquisition of rights in land. Rather than just being raised as defence against legal claims (as is the case for example in promissory estoppel), it is this that sets proprietary estoppel apart and represents its major point of distinction from other estoppels. This chapter considers the requirements for establishing an estoppel claim and the effect of an estoppel on third parties. You come to the law of proprietary estoppel at a time when it is has hit something of a fertile patch. With a bounty of case law, new decisions seemingly handed down almost monthly, proprietary estoppel is having its moment in the sun and remains one of the liveliest and most productive areas of land law today.
Chapter
Essential Cases: Land Law provides a bridge between course textbooks and key case judgments. This case document summarizes the facts and decision in Cobbe v Yeoman’s Row Management Ltd [2008] UKHL 55, House of Lords. The document also includes supporting commentary from author Aruna Nair.
Chapter
Essential Cases: Land Law provides a bridge between course textbooks and key case judgments. This case document summarizes the facts and decision in Jennings v Rice [2002] EWCA Civ 159, Court of Appeal. The document also includes supporting commentary from author Aruna Nair.
Chapter
Essential Cases: Land Law provides a bridge between course textbooks and key case judgments. This case document summarizes the facts and decision in Thorner v Major [2009] UKHL 18, House of Lords. The document also includes supporting commentary from author Aruna Nair.
Chapter
Essential Cases: Land Law provides a bridge between course textbooks and key case judgments. This case document summarizes the facts and decision in Cobbe v Yeoman’s Row Management Ltd [2008] UKHL 55, House of Lords. The document also includes supporting commentary from author Aruna Nair.
Chapter
Essential Cases: Land Law provides a bridge between course textbooks and key case judgments. This case document summarizes the facts and decision in Jennings v Rice [2002] EWCA Civ 159, Court of Appeal. The document also includes supporting commentary from author Aruna Nair.
Chapter
Essential Cases: Land Law provides a bridge between course textbooks and key case judgments. This case document summarizes the facts and decision in Thorner v Major [2009] UKHL 18, House of Lords. The document also includes supporting commentary from author Aruna Nair.
Chapter
This chapter discusses the concepts of unilateral acts, acquiescence, and estoppel, and the relation between the three. All three are rooted in the principle of good faith, but unilateral acts are in their essence statements or representations intended to be binding and publicly manifested as such, whereas acquiescence and estoppel are more general categories, consisting of statements or representations not intended as binding nor amounting to a promise, whose binding force depends on the circumstances.
Chapter
This chapter explores the doctrine of proprietary estoppel—a means by which a person may acquire a proprietary interest in another’s land. If made out, a claim to proprietary estoppel allows for the informal creation and acquisition of rights in land. Rather than just being raised as a defence against legal claims (as is the case, for example, in promissory estoppel), it is this that sets proprietary estoppel apart and represents its major point of distinction from other estoppels. This chapter considers the requirements for establishing an estoppel claim and the effect of an estoppel on third parties. With a bounty of case law—new decisions seemingly handed down almost monthly—proprietary estoppel is having its moment in the sun and remains one of the liveliest and most productive areas of land law today.
Chapter
Jack Beatson, Andrew Burrows, and John Cartwright
This chapter discusses consideration and promissory estoppel. Consideration, a universal requisite of contracts not made by deed, reflects a variety of policies and serves a number of functions. First, enforceability may depend on the content of the promise or the circumstances in which it was made. Second, consideration has been said to identify which promises the parties intend to be legally enforceable. Third, consideration is sometimes seen as a requirement which ensures that a promisor has deliberately decided to contract and prevents parties accidentally binding themselves on impulse. Promissory estoppel is one strand in a broader equitable principle whereby parties to a transaction who have conducted their dealings in reliance on an underlying assumption as to a present, past, or future state of affairs, or on a promise or representation by words or conduct, will not be allowed to go back on that assumption, promise, or representation when it would be unfair or unjust to do so.
Chapter
This chapter addresses proprietary estoppel, which is one of the land law doctrines which allows for the creation of rights in land without a written contract or other formal document. It arises when a person (the promisor) makes a promise to another (the promisee) in relation to their land, and then attempts to go back on that promise in circumstances where it was unfair to do so. Given the general policy of formality, with its associated benefits of certainty and clarity, one must consider the rules relating to proprietary estoppel from the perspective not only of when proprietary estoppel generates rights in land, but also why it does so. This is particularly important in relation to estoppel since it represents a general and potentially broad exception to the formality rules discussed in the fourth chapter. There are three forms of proprietary estoppel: estoppel by representation, estoppel by acquiescence, and estoppel by assurance or promise. The chapter then discusses the consequences of estoppel arising in terms of remedies and effects on third parties. It also examines the relationship between estoppel and formalities, and estoppel and constructive trusts.
Chapter
Essential Cases: Land Law provides a bridge between course textbooks and key case judgments. This case document summarizes the facts and decision in Thorner v Major [2009] UKHL 18, House of Lords. The document also includes supporting commentary from author Aruna Nair.
Chapter
Essential Cases: Land Law provides a bridge between course textbooks and key case judgments. This case document summarizes the facts and decision in Cobbe v Yeoman’s Row Management Ltd [2008] UKHL 55, House of Lords. The document also includes supporting commentary from author Aruna Nair.
