Book

Essential Cases: Equity & Trusts provides a bridge between course textbooks and key case judgments. Essential Cases provides you with succinct summaries of some of the landmark and most influential cases in equity and trusts. Each summary begins with a review of the main case facts and decision. The summary is then concluded with expert commentary on the case from the author, Derek Whayman, including his assessment of the wider questions raised by the decision.

Book

Essential Cases: Equity & Trusts provides a bridge between course textbooks and key case judgments. Essential Cases provides you with succinct summaries of some of the landmark and most influential cases in equity and trusts. Each summary begins with a review of the main case facts and decision. The summary is then concluded with expert commentary on the case from the author, Derek Whayman, including his assessment of the wider questions raised by the decision.

Chapter

Central London Property Trust Ltd v High Trees House Ltd [1947] KB 130 (KB) , noted in Essential Cases ) and it operated only to restrain a defendant where a right was denied. Moreover

Chapter

Ch 1 (CA) and Target Holdings Ltd v Redferns [1996] 1 AC 421 (HL), both noted in Essential Cases , demonstrated there was a requirement of causation in compensation claims against

Chapter

constructive trust cases. See Hopkins (2011) 31 LS 175 and Crossco (No 4) Unlimited v Jolan [2011] EWCA Civ 1619, [2012] 2 All ER 754, Court of Appeal, noted in Essential Cases.

Chapter

Ch 1 (CA) and Target Holdings Ltd v Redferns [1996] 1 AC 421 (HL), both noted in Essential Cases , demonstrated there was a requirement of causation in compensation claims against

Chapter

[1967] 2 AC 46, House of Lords Boardman v Phipps [1967] 2 AC 46 (HL) , noted in Essential Cases ). It is said that this is ‘ pour encourager les autres ’ (at [74]). This appears very

Chapter

been made liable (see also, e.g., Boardman v Phipps [1967] 2 AC 46 (HL), noted in Essential Cases ). It is said that this is ‘ pour encourager les autres ’ (at [74]). This appears very

Chapter

‘fair, just and reasonable’ ( Foskett v McKeown [2001] 1 AC 102 (HL) 109, noted in Essential Cases ). They show considerable reluctance to alter property rights except pursuant to specific

Chapter

proprietary claim cases. As the Supreme Court noted in FHR European Ventures LLP v Cedar Capital Partners LLC [2014] UKSC 45, [2015] AC 250 [43] (noted in Essential Cases ), the monies

Chapter

proprietary claim cases. As the Supreme Court noted in FHR European Ventures LLP v Cedar Capital Partners LLC [2014] UKSC 45, [2015] AC 250 [43] (noted in Essential Cases ), the monies

Chapter

‘fair, just and reasonable’ ( Foskett v McKeown [2001] 1 AC 102 (HL) 109, noted in Essential Cases ). They show considerable reluctance to alter property rights except pursuant to specific

Chapter

required was restated in the case of Bank of Credit and Commerce International (Overseas) Ltd v Akindele [2001] Ch 437 (CA) 452 (also noted in Essential Cases ). Also note that ‘knowledge’

Chapter

required was restated in the case of Bank of Credit and Commerce International (Overseas) Ltd v Akindele [2001] Ch 437 (CA) 452 (also noted in Essential Cases ). Also note that ‘knowledge’

Chapter

European Ventures LLP v Cedar Capital Partners LLC [2014] UKSC 45, both noted in Essential Cases , on these matters. Stephenson LJ briefly expressed doubts but concurred in the result

Chapter

European Ventures LLP v Cedar Capital Partners LLC [2014] UKSC 45, both noted in Essential Cases , on these matters. Stephenson LJ briefly expressed doubts but concurred in the result

Chapter

[1971] AC 424 (HL) and Re Baden’s Deed Trusts (No 2) [1973] Ch 9 (CA) (noted in Essential Cases ), for a discretionary trust, a complete list of objects was required. It was pressed

Chapter

[1971] AC 424 (HL), and Re Baden’s Deed Trusts (No 2) [1973] Ch 9 (CA) (noted in Essential Cases ), for a discretionary trust, a complete list of objects was required. It was pressed

Chapter

of Appeal Bristol and West Building Society v Mothew [1998] Ch 1 , also noted in Essential Cases ). This core does not, however, include the duties of care and skill, prudence and

Chapter

see further Bristol and West Building Society v Mothew [1998] Ch 1, also noted in Essential Cases ). This core does not, however, include the duties of care and skill, prudence, and