Essential Cases: Equity & Trusts provides a bridge between course textbooks and key case judgments. Essential Cases provides you with succinct summaries of some of the landmark and most influential cases in equity and trusts. Each summary begins with a review of the main case facts and decision. The summary is then concluded with expert commentary on the case from the author, Derek Whayman, including his assessment of the wider questions raised by the decision.
1-20 of 374 Results for:
- All: Essential Cases x
- Equity & Trusts x
Did you mean: Essential Cases: Criminal Law, Essential Cases: EU Law, Essential Cases: Public Law ... Essential Cases: Criminal Law, Essential Cases: EU Law, Essential Cases: Public Law, Essential Cases: Equity & Trusts, Essential Cases: Land Law, Essential Cases: Tort Law, Essential Cases: Contract Law, Essential Cases: Contract Law 5e more less
Book
Derek Whayman
Essential Cases: Equity & Trusts provides a bridge between course textbooks and key case judgments. Essential Cases provides you with succinct summaries of some of the landmark and most influential cases in equity and trusts. Each summary begins with a review of the main case facts and decision. The summary is then concluded with expert commentary on the case from the author, Derek Whayman, including his assessment of the wider questions raised by the decision.
Book
Derek Whayman
Essential Cases: Equity & Trusts provides a bridge between course textbooks and key case judgments. Essential Cases provides you with succinct summaries of some of the landmark and most influential cases in equity and trusts. Each summary begins with a review of the main case facts and decision. The summary is then concluded with expert commentary on the case from the author, Derek Whayman, including his assessment of the wider questions raised by the decision.
Chapter
Ch 1 (CA) and Target Holdings Ltd v Redferns [1996] 1 AC 421 (HL), both noted in Essential Cases , demonstrated there was a requirement of causation in compensation claims against
Chapter
constructive trust cases. See Hopkins (2011) 31 LS 175 and Crossco (No 4) Unlimited v Jolan [2011] EWCA Civ 1619, [2012] 2 All ER 754, Court of Appeal, noted in Essential Cases.
Chapter
Central London Property Trust Ltd v High Trees House Ltd [1947] KB 130 (KB) , noted in Essential Cases ) and it operated only to restrain a defendant where a right was denied. Moreover
Chapter
Ch 1 (CA) and Target Holdings Ltd v Redferns [1996] 1 AC 421 (HL), both noted in Essential Cases , demonstrated there was a requirement of causation in compensation claims against
Chapter
been made liable (see also, e.g., Boardman v Phipps [1967] 2 AC 46 (HL), noted in Essential Cases ). It is said that this is ‘ pour encourager les autres ’ (at [74]). This appears very
Chapter
[1967] 2 AC 46, House of Lords Boardman v Phipps [1967] 2 AC 46 (HL) , noted in Essential Cases ). It is said that this is ‘ pour encourager les autres ’ (at [74]). This appears very
Chapter
proprietary claim cases. As the Supreme Court noted in FHR European Ventures LLP v Cedar Capital Partners LLC [2014] UKSC 45, [2015] AC 250 [43] (noted in Essential Cases ), the monies
Chapter
‘fair, just and reasonable’ ( Foskett v McKeown [2001] 1 AC 102 (HL) 109, noted in Essential Cases ). They show considerable reluctance to alter property rights except pursuant to specific
Chapter
‘fair, just and reasonable’ ( Foskett v McKeown [2001] 1 AC 102 (HL) 109, noted in Essential Cases ). They show considerable reluctance to alter property rights except pursuant to specific
Chapter
proprietary claim cases. As the Supreme Court noted in FHR European Ventures LLP v Cedar Capital Partners LLC [2014] UKSC 45, [2015] AC 250 [43] (noted in Essential Cases ), the monies
Chapter
required was restated in the case of Bank of Credit and Commerce International (Overseas) Ltd v Akindele [2001] Ch 437 (CA) 452 (also noted in Essential Cases ). Also note that ‘knowledge’
Chapter
required was restated in the case of Bank of Credit and Commerce International (Overseas) Ltd v Akindele [2001] Ch 437 (CA) 452 (also noted in Essential Cases ). Also note that ‘knowledge’
Chapter
European Ventures LLP v Cedar Capital Partners LLC [2014] UKSC 45, both noted in Essential Cases , on these matters. Stephenson LJ briefly expressed doubts but concurred in the result
Chapter
European Ventures LLP v Cedar Capital Partners LLC [2014] UKSC 45, both noted in Essential Cases , on these matters. Stephenson LJ briefly expressed doubts but concurred in the result
Chapter
[1971] AC 424 (HL), and Re Baden’s Deed Trusts (No 2) [1973] Ch 9 (CA) (noted in Essential Cases ), for a discretionary trust, a complete list of objects was required. It was pressed
Chapter
[1971] AC 424 (HL) and Re Baden’s Deed Trusts (No 2) [1973] Ch 9 (CA) (noted in Essential Cases ), for a discretionary trust, a complete list of objects was required. It was pressed
Chapter
see further Bristol and West Building Society v Mothew [1998] Ch 1, also noted in Essential Cases ). This core does not, however, include the duties of care and skill, prudence, and
