1-20 of 361 Results for:
- All: Essential Cases x
- Tort x
Did you mean: Essential Cases: Criminal Law, Essential Cases: EU Law, Essential Cases: Public Law ... Essential Cases: Criminal Law, Essential Cases: EU Law, Essential Cases: Public Law, Essential Cases: Equity & Trusts, Essential Cases: Land Law, Essential Cases: Tort Law, Essential Cases: Contract Law, Essential Cases: Contract Law 5e more less
Book
Craig Purshouse
Book
Craig Purshouse
Book
Craig Purshouse
Chapter
the antidote to the enzyme disturbance before his death. Comment Barnett is an essential case for its illustration of the ‘but for’ test for determining factual causation. The claimant
Chapter
officer or other prisoner wrongfully locked him in. Comment Iqbal is an essential false imprisonment case for its restatement of the basic elements of the tort. In holding that false
Chapter
Rhodes is an essential case as it clarifies the elements of the rule in Wilkinson v Downton. By reconstructing the historical context of Wilkinson and the subsequent case law, Lady
Chapter
1 AC 155] but also, without any explanation, necessary.’ Comment Frost is an essential case on the law of psychiatric injury generally and primary victims in particular. In
Chapter
rather that where statements are published to a large audience. What makes Caparo an essential case, though, is that it changed the methods the courts use in determining whether a duty
Chapter
event on television. Comment Alcock is an essential case on recovery for negligently inflicted psychiatric damage. The case limits the number of claimants who will be categorized
Chapter
enjoyment of their land against those of their neighbour(s). St Helen’s Smelting Co is an essential case for its distinction between physical damage to land and what is called ‘amenity damage’
Chapter
831 Full case judgment: The reported judgment, cited as [1990] 1 AC 831, is available from the ICLR. Alternatively, you can view the full judgment for this case, cited as [1990]
Chapter
410 Full case judgment: The reported judgment, cited as [1983] 1 AC 410, is available from the ICLR. Alternatively, you can view the full judgment for this case, cited as [1982]
Chapter
1074 Full case judgment: The reported judgment, cited as [1988] 1 AC 1074, is available from the ICLR. Alternatively, you can view the full judgment for this case, cited as [1987]
Chapter
view the full judgment, cited as [2002] UKHL 22, for this case on the open-access BAILII website, http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/2002/22.html Other perspectives: Use the Law Trove
Chapter
46 Full case judgment: The reported judgment, cited as [2004] 1 AC 46, is available from the ICLR. Alternatively, you can view the full judgment for this case, cited as [2003]
Chapter
org/uk/cases/UKHL/2005/23.html Other perspectives: Use the Law Trove search tools to read other authors’ accounts and commentaries on this case. Facts The case consisted
Chapter
UKSC 13 Full case judgment: The reported judgment, cited as [2014] AC 822, is available from the ICLR. Alternatively, you can view the full judgment for this case, cited as [2014]
Chapter
330 Full case judgment: The reported judgment, cited as (1868) LR 3 HL 330, is available from the ICLR. Alternatively, you can view the full judgment for this case, cited as [1868]
Chapter
full judgment, cited as [1997] UKHL 14, for this case on the open-access BAILII website, http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/1997/14.html Other perspectives: Use the Law Trove search
Chapter
18 Full case judgment: The reported judgment, cited as [2019] 3 WLR 18, is available from the ICLR. Alternatively, you can view the full judgment for this case, cited as [2019]