Book

Essential Cases: Tort Law provides a bridge between course textbooks and key case judgments. Essential Cases provides you with succinct summaries of some of the landmark and most influential cases in tort law. Each summary begins with a review of the main case facts and decision. The summary is then concluded with expert commentary on the case from the author, Craig Purshouse, including his assessment of the wider questions raised by the decision.

Book

Essential Cases: Tort Law provides a bridge between course textbooks and key case judgments. Essential Cases provides you with succinct summaries of some of the landmark and most influential cases in tort law. Each summary begins with a review of the main case facts and decision. The summary is then concluded with expert commentary on the case from the author, Craig Purshouse, including his assessment of the wider questions raised by the decision.

Chapter

amenity that arose prior to the killing (at [146]). Comment Henderson is an essential case because it clarifies the approach to illegality. This area of law had been in a confused

Chapter

amenity that arose prior to the killing (at [146]). Comment Henderson is an essential case because it clarifies the approach to illegality. This area of law had been in a confused

Chapter

the bank was not vicariously liable for his torts. Comment Barclays is an essential case as it clarifies the limits of the ‘akin to employment’ test and maintains the traditional

Chapter

the bank was not vicariously liable for his torts. Comment Barclays is an essential case as it clarifies the limits of the ‘akin to employment’ test and maintains the traditional

Chapter

AC 155] but also, without any explanation, necessary’. Comment Frost is an essential case on the law of psychiatric injury generally and primary victims in particular. In

Chapter

AC 155] but also, without any explanation, necessary’. Comment Frost is an essential case on the law of psychiatric injury generally and primary victims in particular. In

Chapter

or other prisoner wrongfully locked him in. Comment Iqbal is an essential false imprisonment case for its restatement of the basic elements of the tort. In holding that false

Chapter

or other prisoner wrongfully locked him in. Comment Iqbal is an essential false imprisonment case for its restatement of the basic elements of the tort. In holding that false

Chapter

antidote to the enzyme disturbance before his death. Comment Barnett is an essential case for its illustration of the ‘but for’ test for determining factual causation. The claimant

Chapter

antidote to the enzyme disturbance before his death. Comment Barnett is an essential case for its illustration of the ‘but for’ test for determining factual causation. The claimant

Chapter

rather that where statements are published to a large audience. What makes Caparo an essential case, though, is that it changed the methods the courts use in determining whether a duty

Chapter

rather that where statements are published to a large audience. What makes Caparo an essential case, though, is that it changed the methods the courts use in determining whether a duty

Chapter

of their land against those of their neighbour(s). St Helen’s Smelting Co. is an essential case for its distinction between physical damage to land and what is called ‘amenity damage’

Chapter

of their land against those of their neighbour(s). St Helen’s Smelting Co. is an essential case for its distinction between physical damage to land and what is called ‘amenity damage’

Chapter

event on television. Comment Alcock is an essential case on recovery for negligently inflicted psychiatric damage. The case limits the number of claimants who will be categorized

Chapter

event on television. Comment Alcock is an essential case on recovery for negligently inflicted psychiatric damage. The case limits the number of claimants who will be categorized

Chapter

831 Full case judgment: The reported judgment, cited as [1990] 1 AC 831, is available from the ICLR. Alternatively, you can view the full judgment for this case, cited as [1990]

Chapter

831 Full case judgment: The reported judgment, cited as [1990] 1 AC 831, is available from the ICLR. Alternatively, you can view the full judgment for this case, cited as [1990]