Show Summary Details
A Practical Approach to Alternative Dispute Resolution

A Practical Approach to Alternative Dispute Resolution (5th edn)

Susan Blake, Julie Browne, and Stuart Sime
Page of

Printed from Oxford Law Trove. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a single article for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy and Legal Notice).

date: 21 April 2024

p. 393. Factors Influencing the Selection of an ADR Optionlocked

p. 393. Factors Influencing the Selection of an ADR Optionlocked

  • Susan Blake, Susan BlakeProfessor, Barrister and Associate Dean of Education, The City Law School, City, University of Londona
  • Julie BrowneJulie BrowneAssociate Professor, Barrister and Deputy Course Director of the BPTC, The City Law School, City, University of London
  •  and Stuart SimeStuart SimeProfessor, Barrister and Course Director of the BPTC, The City Law School, City, University of London

Abstract

This chapter identifies the factors influencing the selection of an alternative dispute resolution (ADR) option. A lawyer has a general professional duty to give legal advice on ADR options, and there are identifiable points in a case and in litigation where this is particularly important. It is good practice to have a coherent strategy as regards potential use of ADR to resolve a dispute. There are many factors that may be relevant to the use of ADR, and to which form of ADR is most appropriate, including cost, the nature of the dispute, and the objectives of the parties. It is important to select the ones relevant to each case. The chapter then considers the various concerns which may be expressed in relation to ADR, as well as the various ways to encourage a reluctant opponent to use ADR.

You do not currently have access to this chapter

Sign in

Please sign in to access the full content.

Subscribe

Access to the full content requires a subscription