Show Summary Details
Markesinis & Deakin's Tort Law

Markesinis & Deakin's Tort Law (8th edn)

Simon Deakin and Zoe Adams
Page of

Printed from Oxford Law Trove. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a single article for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy and Legal Notice).

date: 13 September 2024

p. 87125. Other Remedies and Multiple Liabilitieslocked

p. 87125. Other Remedies and Multiple Liabilitieslocked

  • Simon DeakinSimon DeakinProfessor of Law and a Fellow of Peterhouse, University of Cambridge
  • , and Zoe AdamsZoe AdamsJunior Research Fellow, King's College, University of Cambridge, King's College, University of Cambridge

Abstract

This chapter discusses continues from the preliminary discussion of remedies in chapter 24, to discuss the following: injunctions, damages in lieu of an injunction, and joint and concurrent liability. An action for damages lies after a tort has been committed. An injunction is sought to prevent the continuance of a tort or in anticipation of a threatened tort. It is an order commanding the discontinuance of some activity or forbidding the causing of damage. Where a court could issue an injunction, but decides against doing so, it may award damages in lieu. This power was originally conferred by section 2 of the Chancery Amendment Act 1858 (Lord Cairns’ Act) and has been continued by later legislation. The chapter discusses when it might be appropriate for a court to make an award of damages in lieu of an injunction, particularly in light of recent case law in the context of the law of nuisance. The issue of joint and concurrent liability is also of interest, and should be understood against the back-drop of the discussion about causation in chapter five.

You do not currently have access to this chapter

Sign in

Please sign in to access the full content.

Subscribe

Access to the full content requires a subscription