Show Summary Details
Essential Cases: Public Law

Essential Cases: Public Law (6th edn)

Thomas E. Webb
Page of

Printed from Oxford Law Trove. Under the terms of the licence agreement, an individual user may print out a single article for personal use (for details see Privacy Policy and Legal Notice).

date: 11 October 2024

Reference by the Lord Advocate of devolution issues under paragraph 34 of Schedule 6 to the Scotland Act 1998 [2022] UKSC 31, Supreme Court (also known as Scottish Independence Referendum Bill)locked

Reference by the Lord Advocate of devolution issues under paragraph 34 of Schedule 6 to the Scotland Act 1998 [2022] UKSC 31, Supreme Court (also known as Scottish Independence Referendum Bill)locked

  • Thomas E. WebbThomas E. WebbSenior Lecturer in Law, Lancaster University

Abstract

Essential Cases: Public Law provides a bridge between course textbooks and key case judgments. This case document summarizes the facts and decision in Reference by the Lord Advocate of devolution issues under paragraph 34 of Schedule 6 to the Scotland Act 1998 [2022] UKSC 31, Supreme Court (also known as the Scottish Independence Referendum Bill). This case concerned whether a reference by the Lord Advocate raised a devolution matter; if it did, whether the UKSC should accept the reference for consideration; and, if it did consider it, whether the subject matter of the reference—which related to draft legislation to enable a referendum on Scottish independence—was within the legislative competence of the Scottish Parliament. The document also includes supporting commentary and questions from author Thomas Webb.

You do not currently have access to this chapter

Sign in

Please sign in to access the full content.

Subscribe

Access to the full content requires a subscription